Democrat Proposals on Bill to Take Your Guns

Data gathered from weaselzippers.us


Republican NY State Assemblyman Steve McLaughlin released the above video showing an attempt by his Democratic opponents in the Assembly to keep a list of their gun control proposals secret, once they had decided on the bill passed in NY this past week.
The list shows how far they are willing to go, even onto confiscation of some guns, as well as continuing the demonization of legitimate law-abiding gun owners.
Here is McLaughlin’s Facebook post with the list that the Democrats were trying to supress:

Here it is. This is the video where I was asked to keep the Democrat proposals for the NY SAFE Act away from the public. This list was given to me by a colleague and it is not confidential.
This bill was an attack on the 2nd amendment and the Democrats clearly wanted to dismantle the work of the Founding Fathers. None of these amendments were included in the final bill thanks to us fighting back. I will not stand silent while these unpatriotic proposals are pathetically thrown at us a 11 o’clock at night:

1. Confiscation of “assault weapons”
2. Confiscation of ten round clips
3. Statewide database for ALL Guns
4. Continue to allow pistol permit holder’s information to be replaced to the public
5. Label semiautomatic shotguns with more than 5 rounds or pistol grips as “assault weapons”
6. Limit the number of rounds in a magazine to 5 and confiscation and forfeiture of banned magazines
7. Limit possession to no more than two (2) magazines
8. Limit purchase of guns to one gun per person per month
9. Require re-licensing of all pistol permit owners
10. Require renewal of all pistol permits every five years
11. State issued pistol permits
12. Micro-stamping of all guns in New York State
13. Require licensing of all gun ammo dealers
14. Mandatory locking of guns at home
15. Fee for licensing, registering weapons

UN is UN-American

Over several years the deluge of anti-American views and votes coming out of the United Nations has built layer upon layer within me that grows stronger against this organization.  I thought it was as well known as the sun rising in the East and setting in the West that everyone understood that the UN was anti American and anti-Israel (any USA allies) but I stumbled across someone that was shocked by such a revelation.

As the discussion progressed (about two comments into it) I was asked to show references and proof and such as to my beliefs.  Wow.. that opened up a massive project to go back and prove that the sun rises in the East.  Regardless, I figure it's a noble cause to collected up just a handful of the United Nations actions to share with the sheeple of the United States so they at least can't claim ignorance any longer.

I am going to add some bullet points below that will separate various topic changes; a list per-say that backs up my claim that the United Nations is anti-American (and it's allies).

• UN Small Arms Gun Treaty

Creation of the UN Arms Trade Treaty put on hold today (November 6th) and to be continued after the election.  Purpose is to "track and trace" every round of ammunition on the planet from where it was manufactured to point of use.

Confiscate and destroy all civilian owned firearms.

Ban trade and ownership of all semi-automatic weapons.

Create an international gun registry.

Hillary Clinton has announced they will be working with the UN to pass this UN Small Arms Treaty.

http://thehill.com/

http://www.dailypaul.com/

http://thenewamerican.com/

http://www.nationalgunrights.org/

• Agenda 21

George Soros sponsored UN plan.  Nice happy entire planet plans to remove single family homes, private property ownership, removal of private car ownership and individual travel choices and removal of privately owned farms.  In short, to impose the tenets of Social Justice/Socialism on the world.

http://www.un.org/

• Arab/Islamic states consistently vote against the U.S. in the United Nations

Below are the actual voting records of various Arabic/Islamic States which are recorded in both the US State Department and United Nations records:

Kuwait votes against the United States 67% of the time 

Qatar votes against the United States 67% of the time 

Morocco votes against the United States 70% of the time 

United Arab Emirates votes against the United States 70% of the time. 

Jordan votes against the United States 71% of the time. 

Tunisia votes against the United States 71% of the time. 

Saudi Arabia votes against the United States 73% of the time.

Yemen votes against the United States 74% of the time. 

Algeria votes against the United States 74% of the time. 

Oman votes against the United States 74% of the time. 

Sudan votes against the United States 75% of the time. 

Pakistan votes against the United States 75% of the time. 

Libya votes against the United States 76% of the time. 

Egypt votes against the United States 79% of the time. 

Lebanon votes against the United States 80% of the time. 

India votes against the United States 81% of the time. 

Syria votes against the United States 84% of the time. 

Mauritania votes against the United States 87% of the time. 

U S Foreign Aid to those that hate us:

Egypt, for example, after voting 79% of the time against the United States, still receives $2,000,000,000 annually in US Foreign Aid.

Jordan votes 71% against the United States and receives $192,814,000 annually in US Foreign Aid.

Pakistan votes 75% against the United States Receives $6,721,000,000 annually in US Foreign Aid.

India votes 81% against the United States Receives $143,699,000 annually.

http://www.snopes.com/

But yet we fund a shockingly high percentage of the UN budget.

http://en.wikipedia.org/

On June 17, 2005, the United States House of Representatives passed a bill (H.R. 2745) to slash funds to the UN in half by 2008 if it does not meet certain criteria. This reflects years of complaints about anti-American and anti-Israeli bias in the UN, particularly the exclusion of Israel from many decision-making organizations. The U.S. is estimated to contribute about 22% of the UN's yearly budget due to the UN's ability-to-pay scale, making this bill potentially devastating to the UN. The Bush administration and several former U.S. ambassadors to the UN have warned that this may only strengthen anti-American sentiment around the world and serve to hurt current UN reform movements. The bill passed the House in June 2005, and a parallel bill was introduced in the Senate by Gordon Smith on July 13, 2005. [3] However, a number of leading Senate Republicans objected to the requirement that the U.S. contributions be halved if the UN failed to meet all of the criteria. The UN Management, Personnel, and Policy Reform Act of 2005 (S. 1394), introduced on July 12, 2005 into the Senate by Sen. Norm Coleman [R-MN] and Sen. Richard Lugar [R-IN], called for similar reforms but left the withholding of dues to the discretion of the President [4]. As of February 2006, neither bill has come to a vote.

http://en.wikipedia.org/

• Casual summary of the United Nations as a hypocritical joke.

• It's not just me.  Several others speaking out.

“If there’s one thing the self-appointed defenders of human rights can’t get enough of, it’s camping out in five star hotels in New York while slinging abuse at America and its allies,” said Jason Kenney, Canada’s citizenship, immigration and multiculturalism minister.

“Canada will no longer make the mistake of confusing process with results, or participation with action,” he said. “Most importantly, we will not be afraid to stand on principle and defend our own interests and those of our friends.”

Canada was the first country to announce its withdrawal from the Durban III event, leading the way for the U.S. and more than a dozen others to do so. Canada was also the first to say it would stay away from the previous Durban conference, in Geneva in 2009.

Wrapping up the event, conference organizer Anne Bayefsky said the meeting had been held “to shine a light of day” on what was happening at the U.N. nearby – “to ensure that the dots between hate and violence are seared in our collective minds.”

“We said, ‘no, not in our name,’” she said. “Now it’s time to translate that resounding ‘no’ into a political message, for the United Nations and democracies around the world.”

------------------------------

For a long time we have observed with dismay that the great idea of creating the U.N. for the betterment of mankind has been reduced into a group of nations blinded by the most disturbing feelings of anti-Americanism while permitting the greatest menace to the world, communism, to flourish. Indeed, the U.N. did little to alleviate this suffering upon mankind.

While the U.N. seems to condemn the U.S. at every opportunity, it has been silent about the gross violations of human rights in each and every communist country that has existed on the face of the earth. In the eyes of the world, it seems, the policy mistakes of the U.S. easily obliterate the extermination of 100 million people in the forced imposition of the criminal communist philosophy.

Unfortunately, many members of that supposedly respected body are coming from authoritarian, dictatorial, tyrannical and totalitarian communist regimes in which individual freedoms and human rights don’t exist. Yet they condemn us. In my opinion, the U.N. has become ineffective and irrelevant and more accurately should be called the United Anti-American Nations (UAAN), since that seems to be its united cause.

That united front of anti-Americanism has developed a history of looking the other way when the enemies of the U.S. enslave, torture and murder their citizens. As a matter of fact, that is what they have done in the case of Cuba.

They would rather abstain, vote against or veto the condemnation of those barbaric acts against humanity for the simple reason of going against the U.S. They have even expelled the U.S. from the Human Rights Commission while other criminal regimes that systematically violate human rights, like Libya – clearly a terrorist state – were admitted.

The hatred that has followed this worldwide envy for America’s progress and standard of living has been the end result and legacy of 70-some nefarious years of the application of Marxism-Leninism in the most perverse and destructive ways. Only people who have lived inside a communist country can fully understand the evilness of that system.

(This is a very good article.  To read the full article click here ).

I've just scratched the surface of this issue.  You could literally dedicate your entire professional career dealing with this topic and I think I've covered enough of the issues to wet the appetite for those who truly want to know the truth; to dig in and start looking and learning on their own.